Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Organizational Behavior Essay Example for Free
Organizational Behavior Essay1. Does this case go up stinting downturns and beau monde layoffs fail to lead to workplace malfeasance? Why or why not? This case proves economical downturns and company layoffs lead to workplace malfeasance. According to dictionary.com malfeasance is the performance by a public official of an comp enhance that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law. It is also defined as wrongdoing ( habitd especially of an act in violation of a public trust. According to the case incident These companies often produce chargeure sensation releases, which hence work their way into the media and presumably generate potential clients for the organizations (Robbins Judge, 2010, pg. 35). This statement has led me to believe that companies use press releases to make their situation seem worse than it actually is in order to gain clients for their organization.2. Does the case prove we can learn nothing from the business press? The case proves that we can learn something from the business press however we should not believe everything we read. According to the case, MSN Money, under the headline Businesses See Rise in Employee Theft, inform the poll results as follows When asked if they had noticed a recent rise in monetary theft among employees, untold(prenominal) as fraudulent transactions or missing gold, 18% tell yes, 41% were unsure and the stick around said they hadnt (Robbins Judge, 2010, pg. 35). However, put a different way 18% agreed that theft was up and 82% either disagreed or werent sure. Based on MSN Moneys report it sounds standardized theft really has increased however if you look at it another way most companies said they havent seen an increase or they just havent noticed a rise in theft.3. Does this chapter provide any clues for how you can be an informed consumer of business news on OB issues? In some ways this chapter provides clues for how you can be an informed consumer of business news on OB issue s because it explains how managers stay informed. According to the text, All managers, to some degree, collect information from outside organizations and institutions, typically by scanning the news media (including the internet) and talking with other people to learn of changes in the publics tastes, what competitors may be planning, and the like (Robbins Judge, 2010, pg. 6).4. Some companies install surveillance equipment (cameras, computer software) to monitor their employees. Valenti Management, which owns and runs 117 Wendys and 17 cayenne peppers restaurants, has installed fingerprint scanners on all its cash registers. Do you think these measures infringe too much on individual privacy? Can a company take saloon too remote? How do you strike a balance between prevention and intrusion? When you become an employee of a company you have in essence agreed to the monitoring that is taking place. Although fingerprint scanners on all cash registers sounds like pretty extreme me asure it is a way for the company to be sure that the employee that is suppositious to be working the register is actually the one working the register.If the company uses a clock in number such as the four digits of an employees social security number another employee could use that number, take money from the register and then the blame would go on the wrong person. I do believe a company can take prevention to far however, I dont believe Valenti Management has done so in this case. Striking a balance between prevention and intrusion can be very difficult however I do believe it is possible, in the first place a company implements a new prevention measure it should determine whether the measure is absolutely requirement to prevent employee theft.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment